Reanalysis of atmospheric circulation for the Black Sea-Caspian region

A.E. Anisimov, D.A. Yarovaya, V.S. Barabanov

Marine Hydrophysical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Sevastopol, Russian Federation

Abstract

The results of numerical simulations aimed at dynamic downscaling the ERA-Interim reanalysis data for the Black Sea-Caspian region using the _RegCM_4 climate model are described. The downscaling results in reconstruction of the atmospheric circulation fields in the region with the increased spatial resolution (25×25 km) for 1979–2013. The modeling results are compared with the original large-scale fields with the purpose to validate the regional model. The analysis shows that the model correctly reproduces climate in the region; at that original integral climatic characteristics are retained. Realistic annual cycle and seasonal spatial distribution of main meteorological parameters (temperature, precipitation and wind circulation) are obtained by the model simulations. However, the following discrepancies are found.

In the northern part of the region summer air temperature is overestimated by 1.5–2°C. This effect is observed in the flat areas and it does not related to the model orography differences. Probably, overestimation of summer temperature is related to disadvantages of cloud cover parameterization schemes and inaccuracies of radiation calculation. In favor of this assumption comes underestimation of summer precipitation amount in the northern areas of the domain.

Overestimated (by 25–30 %) precipitation in the autumn-winter period and the heightened (by 1.5–2 °C) air temperature in summer are noted in the northern part of the region. Further analysis shows that the increased precipitation is, mainly, a result of overestimating its intensity, whereas the simulated precipitation frequency approximates the original data. Precipitation intensity according to regional model data significantly exceeds the one obtained according to reanalysis data during the entire year. In the cold season this is related to more intensive large-scale (non-convective) precipitation prevailing in this period.

Hence, the scheme of precipitation parameterization requires optimization.

Keywords

Black Sea region, Caspian region, climate modeling, regional model, reanalysis

For citation

Anisimov, A.E., Yarovaya, D.A. and Barabanov, V.S., 2015. Reanalysis of atmospheric circulation for the Black Sea-Caspian region. Physical Oceanography, (4), pp. 13-25. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2015-4-13-25

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2015-4-13-25

References

  1. Efimov, V.V., Anisimov, A.E., 2011, “Klimaticheskie kharakteristiki izmenchivosti polya vetra v chernomorskom regione – chislenny reanaliz regionalnoy atmosfernoy ysirkulyatsii [Climatic parameters of wind field variability in the Black Sea region: Numerical reanalysis of regional atmospheric circulation]”, Izv. RAN, Fizika atmosfery i okeana, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 380 – 392 (in Russian).
  2. Efimov, V.V., Belokopytov, V.N. & Anisimov, A.E., 2012, “Otsenka sostavlyayushchikh vodnogo balansa Chernogo morya [Estimation of water balance components in the Black Sea]”, Metrologiay i gidrologiya, no. 12, pp. 69 – 76 (in Russian).
  3. Giorgi, F., Anyah, R.O., 2012, “The road towards RegCM4”, Clim. Res. vol. 52, pp. 3 – 6.
  4. Christensen, J.H., Christensen, D.B. 2006, “A summary of the PRUDENCE model projections of changes in European climate by the end of this century”, Clim. Change, vol. 81, no.1, pp. 7 – 30.
  5. 2009, “ENSEMBLES: climate change and its impacts: Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project”, Eds: P. Van der Linden, J.F.B. Mitchel, Exeter: Met Office Hadley Centre, 160 p.
  6. Halenka, T.C., 2010, “EC FP6 Project on the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts in Central and Eastern Europe”, Global Environmental Change: Challenges to Science and Society in Southeastern Europe, Netherlands, Springer, pp. 125 – 137.
  7. Jacob, D., Petersen, J. & Eggert, B., 2014, “EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research”, Reg. Env. Change, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 563 – 578.
  8. Mearns, L.O., Arritt, R. & Biner, S. [et al.], 2012, “The North American regional climate change assessment program: Overview of phase I results”, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 93, no. 8, pp. 1337 – 1362.
  9. Önol, B., Semazzi, H.M.F., 2009, “Regionalization of climate change simulations over the eastern Mediterranean”, J. Clim., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1944 – 1961.
  10. Bozkurt, D., Turuncoglu, U. & Sen, O.L. [et al.], 2012, “Downscaled simulations of the ECHAM5, CCSM3 and HadCM3 global models for the eastern Mediterranean – Black Sea region: evaluation of the reference period”, Clim. Dyn., vol. 39, no. 1 – 2, pp. 207 – 225.
  11. Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M.R. & Bates, G.T., 1993, “Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part I: Boundary-layer and radiative transfer processes”, Mon. Wea. Rev., vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 2794 – 2813.
  12. Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M.R. & Bates, G.T. [et al.], 1993, “Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions”, Ibid., pp. 2814 – 2832.
  13. Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J. & Stauffer, D.R., 1995, “A description of the fifth-generation Penn State / NCAR mesoscale model (MM5)”, NCAR Tech. Note, 131 p.
  14. Holtslag, A., de Bruijn, E. & Pan, H.L., 1990, “A high resolution air mass transformation model for short-range weather forecasting”, Mon. Wea. Rev., vol. 118, no. 8, pp. 1561 – 1575.
  15. Giorgi, F., Coppola, E. & Solmon, F. [et al.], 2012, “RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains”, Clim. Res., vol. 52, pp. 7 – 29.
  16. Grell, G.A. 1993, “Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations”, J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 764 – 787.
  17. Arakawa, A., Schubert, W.H., 1974, “Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment, Part I”, Ibid., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 674 – 701.
  18. Emanuel, K.A., 1991, “A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models”, Ibid., vol. 48, no. 21.pp. 2313 – 2329.
  19. Pal, J.S., Small, E.E. & Eltahir, E.A.B., 2000, “Simulation of regional‐scale water and energy budgets: Representation of subgrid cloud and precipitation processes within RegCM” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 105, no. D24, pp. 29579 – 29594.
  20. Kiehl, J.T., Hack, J.J. & Bonan, G.B. [et al.], 1996, “Description of the NCAR community climate model (CCM3)”, NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/Tech. Rep. TN-420+STR, 152 p.
  21. Giorgi, F., Mearns, L.O., 1999, “Introduction to special section: Regional climate modeling revisited”, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., vol. 104, no. D6, pp. 6335 – 6352.
  22. Dickinson, R.E., Kennedy, P.J. & Henderson-Sellers, A. [et al.], 1993, “Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model”, Tech. Rep. TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 72 p.
  23. Dee, D.P., Uppala, S.M. & Simmons, A.J. [et al.], 2011, “The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system”, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 137, no. 656, pp. 553 – 597.
  24. Efimov, V.V., Anisimov, A.E., 2012, “Vliyanie Chernogo morya na regionalny klimat [Impact of the Black Sea on regional climate]”, Morskoy gidrofizicheskiy zhurnal, vol. 2, pp. 37 – 49 (in Russian).
  25. Torma, C., Coppola, E. & Giorgi, F. [et. al.], 2011, “Validation of a high-resolution version of the regional climate model RegCM3 over the Carpathian Basin” J. Hydrometeorol. vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 84 – 100.
  26. Elguindi, N., Bi, X. & Giorgi, F. [et al.], 2013, “Regional Climatic Model RegCM User Manual. Version 4.3”, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, 34 p.

Download the article (PDF)