Dynamics of the Black Sea Upper Layer Based on Satellite Data: Gridded Altimetry versus High Resolution IR Images

A. I. Mizyuk✉, G. K. Korotaev

Marine Hydrophysical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Sevastopol, Russian Federation

✉ e-mail: artem.mizyuk@mhi-ras.ru

Abstract

Purpose. During more than 20 years, very detailed notions of the sea level variability in the World Ocean and its particular parts have been obtained based on satellite altimetry observations. Their advantage consists in possibility of a fairly rapid assessment of the surface currents’ velocities at meso scales. The alternative method for studying surface dynamics is motion estimation using a sequence of visible/infrared (IR) satellite images of the sea surface. The purpose of the present study is to compare the results obtaineds from application of two described methods used to analyze general circulation of the Black Sea surface layer.

Methods and Results. The structure of the current fields in the northwestern Black Sea in winter, 1999 is investigated using the results of analysis of the IR image sequence from the NOAA/AVHRR sensors, as well as the gridded sea level anomaly (SLA) data (processing level L4) and the along-track measurements (level processing L3) from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service. The surface currents’ velocities are estimated based on the sea level field, which is calculated using two versions of mean dynamic topography. To compare the gridded altimetry and the results of the image sequence processing, a simple procedure is proposed for reconstructing the sea level using the current velocities’ components. The results of reconstructing the surface circulation features by two methods were compared and demonstrated, in particular, the anticyclonic eddy locations in the northwestern part of the Black Sea. It is noted that the locations of the eddy center in the sea level fields reconstructed from the altimetry data and by processing of the IR image sequence are different. Evolution of the eddy is investigated using the SLA data. It is shown that its motion is rather intermittent in time that can be a result of applying the procedure of optimal interpolation.

Conclusions. It is noted that the gridded satellite altimetry product from the CMEMS, being applied to the Black Sea basin, should be used with due regard for the provided information on the mapping errors.

Keywords

satellite altimetry, image sequence analysis, motion estimation, mesoscale variability, Black Sea, Copernicus

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Head of the Remote Sensing Department, FSBSI MHI, Ph.D. S.V. Stanichny for providing satellite IR images of the NOAA/AVHRR sensors. The investigation is carried out in Marine Hydrophysical Institute, RAS, with financial support of the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 17-77-30001).

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © A. I. Mizyuk, G. K. Korotaev, 2019, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 233–247 (2019)

For citation

Mizyuk, A.I. and Korotaev, G.K., 2019. Dynamics of the Black Sea Upper Layer Based on Satellite Data: Gridded Altimetry versus High Resolution IR Images. Physical Oceanography, 26(3), pp. 214-224. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2019-3-214-224

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2019-3-214-224

References

  1. Fu, L.-L. and Cazenave, A., eds., 2001. Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences: A Handbook of Techniques and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press, 463 p.
  2. Fu, L.L. and Le Traon, P.-Y., 2006. Satellite Altimetry and Ocean Dynamics. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, [e-journal] 338(14-15), pp. 1063-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2006.05.015
  3. Ablain, M., Legeais, J.F., Prandi, P., Marcos, M., Fenoglio-Marc, L., Dieng, H.B., Benveniste, J. and Cazenave, A., 2017. Satellite Altimetry-Based Sea Level at Global and Regional Scales. Surveys in Geophysics, [e-journal] 38(1), pp. 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9389-8
  4. Morrow, R. and Le Traon, P.-Y., 2012. Recent Advances in Observing Mesoscale Ocean Dynamics with Satellite Altimetry. Advances in Space Research, [e-journal] 50(8), pp. 1062-1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.033
  5. Xu, Y., Li, J. and Dong, S., 2009. Ocean Circulation from Altimetry: Progresses and Challenges. In: J. A. Long, D. S. Wells., Eds., 2009. Ocean Circulation and El Nino: New Research. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers. Chapter 3, pp. 7197. Available at: https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/docs/OceanFromAltimetry-Xu_et_al.pdf [Accessed: 30 April 2019].
  6. Storto, A., Dobricic, S., Masina, S. and Di Pietro, P., 2011. Assimilating Along-Track Altimetric Observations Through Local Hydrostatic Adjustment in a Global Ocean Variational Assimilation System. Monthly Weather Review, [e-journal] 139(3), pp. 738-754. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3350.1
  7. Korotaev, G.K., Oguz, T., Dorofeyev, V.L., Demyshev, S.G., Kubryakov, A.I. and Ratner, Yu.B., 2011. Development of Black Sea Nowcasting and Forecasting System. Ocean Science, [e-journal] 7(5), pp. 629-649. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-7-629-2011
  8. Korotaev, G., Oguz, T., Nikiforov, A. and Koblinsky, C., 2003. Seasonal, Interannual, and Mesoscale Variability of the Black Sea Upper Layer Circulation Derived from Altimeter Data. Journal of Geophysical Research, [e-journal] 108(C4), 3122. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001508
  9. Kubryakov, A.A. and Stanichny, S.V., 2015. Mesoscale Eddies in the Black Sea from Satellite Altimetry Data. Oceanology, [e-journal] 55(1), pp. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437015010105
  10. V. M. Zhurbas, A. G. Zatsepin, Yu. V. Grigor’eva, V. N. Eremeev, V. V. Kremenetsky, Motyzhev, S.V., Poyarkov, S.G., Poulain, P.-M., Stanichny, S.V. and Soloviev, D.M., 2004. Water Circulation and Characteristics of Currents of Different Scales in the Upper Layer of the Black Sea from Drifter Data. Oceanology, 44(1), pp. 30-43.
  11. Béréziat, D., Herlin, I. and Younes, L., 2000. A Generalized Optical Flow Constraint and Its Physical Interpretation. In: IEEE, 2000. Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662). Hilton Head Island, SC: IEEE. Vol. 2, pp. 487-492. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2000.854890
  12. Huot, E., Isambert, T., Herlin, I., Berroir, J.-P. and Korotaev, G., 2006. Data Assimilation of Satellite Images Within an Oceanographic Circulation Model. In: IEEE, 2006. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings. Toulouse: IEEE, pp. II-II. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1660330
  13. Korotaev, G.K., Huot, E., Le Dimet, F.-X., Herlin, I., Stanichny S.V., Solovyev, D.M. and Wu, L., 2008. Retrieving Ocean Surface Current by 4-D Variational Assimilation of Sea Surface Temperature Images. Remote Sensing of Environment, [e-journal] 112(4), pp. 1464-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.020
  14. Kubryakov, A., Plotnikov, E. and Stanichny, S., 2018. Reconstructing Large- and Mesoscale Dynamics in the Black Sea Region from Satellite Imagery and Altimetry Data – a Comparison of Two Methods. Remote Sensing, [e-journal] 10(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020239
  15. Pujol, M.-I., Faugère, Y., Taburet, G., Dupuy, S., Pelloquin, C., Ablain, M. and Picot, N., 2016. DUACS DT2014: the New Multi-Mission Altimeter Data Set Reprocessed over 20 Years. Ocean Science, [e- journal] 12(5), pp. 1067-1090. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-1067-2016
  16. Bretherton, F.P., Davis, R.E., Fandry, C.B., 1976. A Technique for Objective Analysis and Design of Oceanographic Experiments Applied to MODE-73. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, [e-journal] 23(7), pp. 559-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(76)90001-2
  17. Kubryakov, A.A. and Stanichny, S.V., 2012. Reconstruction of Mean Dynamic Topography of the Black Sea for Altimetry Measurements. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, [e-journal] 48(9), pp. 973- 979. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433812090095
  18. Knysh, V.V., Demyshev, S.G., Inyushina, N.V. and Korotaev, G.K., 2008. Assimilation of Climatic Hydrological Data in a Black-Sea Model Based on the Algorithm of Adaptive Statistics of Prognostic Errors. Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] 18(1), pp. 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11110-008-9006-6

Download the article (PDF)