Verification of the ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data in the Azov-Black Sea Basin

T. B. Grankina1, ✉, R. A. Ibrayev1, 2, 3, P. A. Mogilnikov3

1 Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

2 Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

3 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Dolgoprudny, Russian Federation

✉ e-mail: grankina@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose. The paper purpose is to assess quality of meteorological information for the Azov–Black Sea basin derived from the ERA-Interim reanalysis (the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), and to examine possibility of using the obtained data for presetting atmospheric forcing in the numerical hydrodynamic model of the Black and Azov seas. ERA-Interim.

Methods and Results. The analysis is based on comparison of the annual average fields with the measurement data on the atmospheric circulation parameters represented in hydrometeorological atlases. The most significant discrepancies between the ERA-Interim fields and the data of climatic arrays are noted and, consequently, the discrepancy-related potential errors arising in reproducing water circulation in the indicated seas are considered.

Conclusions. The comparative analysis showed that, for a number of the parameters, the reanalysis data were in qualitative agreement with the measurements. The highest discrepancies (up to 70%) were revealed in the precipitation field nearby the Caucasian coast in autumn. Such an error in the boundary conditions can negatively affect both the sea surface salinity distribution in the numerical modeling and, therefore, reproduction of thermohaline circulation in this region of the sea. A significant error in the results of numerical modeling can also be induced by the discrepancies in the wind fields. In the ERA-Interim data, the wind speed module is generally understated by 7% over the whole Black Sea in a spring-summer period, and by 20–25% in the Azov Sea throughout a year. The direction of the resultant wind is the most distorted in summer, whereas in winter, the deviations are significant only in the southeastern part of the Black Sea. The best agreement is observed between the temperature and air humidity fields, and the climatic arrays’ data: the discrepancies between the values of these parameters are minimal.

Keywords

the Black Sea, the Azov Sea, ERA-Interim, hydrodynamic modeling, atmospheric forcing

Acknowledgements

The research is carried out in the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, RAS within the framework of the state order of FASO, RAS (theme No. 0149-2018-0021) under the partial support of RFBR (project No. 17-05-01282).

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © T. B. Grankina, R. A. Ibrayev, P. A. Mogilnikov, 2019, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 261–272 (2019)

For citation

Grankina, T.B., Ibrayev, R.A. and Mogilnikov, P.A., 2019. Verification of the ERA-Interim Reanalysis Data in the Azov–Black Sea Basin. Physical Oceanography, 26(3), pp. 236-246. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2019-3-236-246

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2019-3-236-246

References

  1. Knysh, V.V, Korotaev, G.K. and Lishaev, P.N., 2016. Methodology of Application of the Black Sea Three-Dimensional Temperature and Salinity Fields Reconstructed on the Basis of Altimetry and Scanty Measurements in the Operational Prognostic Model. Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] (2), pp. 46-61. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2016-2-46-61
  2. Demyshev, S.G. and Dymova, O.A., 2017. Calculation and Analysis of Water Circulation Energetics in the Black Sea Coastal Regions. Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] (3), pp. 45- 57. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2017-3-45-57
  3. Dianskii, N.A., Fomin, V.V., Zhokhova, N.V. and Korshenko, A.N., 2013. Simulations of Currents and Pollution Transport in the Coastal Waters of Big Sochi. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, [e-journal] 49 (6), pp. 611-621. doi:10.1134/S0001433813060042
  4. Stanev, E.V., 1990. On the Mechanisms of the Black Sea Circulation. Earth-Science Reviews, [e-journal] 28(4), pp. 285-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(90)90052-W
  5. Stanev, E.V., Bowman, M.J., Peneva, E.L. and Staneva, J.V., 2003. Control of Black Sea Intermediate Water Mass Formation by Dynamics and Topography: Comparison of Numerical Simulations, Surveys and Satellite Data. Journal of Marine Research, [e-journal] 61(1), pp. 59-99. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224003321586417
  6. Miladinova, S., Stips, A., Garcia-Gorriz, E. and Macias Moy, D., 2017. Black Sea Thermohaline Properties: Long-Term Trends and Variations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, [e-journal] 122(7), pp. 5624–5644. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012644
  7. Miladinova, S., Stips, A., Garcia-Gorriz, E. and Macias Moy, D., 2018. Formation and Changes of the Black Sea Cold Intermediate Layer. Progress in Oceanography, [e-journal] 167, pp. 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.07.002
  8. Kubryakov, A.A. and Stanichny, S.V., 2015. Seasonal and Interannual Variability of the Black Sea Eddies and its Dependence on Characteristics of the Large-Scale Circulation. Deep-Sea Research I: Oceanographic Research Papers, [e-journal] 97, pp. 80-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.002
  9. Korotenko, K.A., 2015. Modeling Mesoscale Circulation of the Black Sea. Oceanology, [e-journal] 55(6), pp. 820-826. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437015060077
  10. Beşiktepe, Ş., Lozano, C.J. and Robinson, A.R., 2001. On the Summer Mesoscale Variability of the Black Sea. Journal of Marine Research, [e-journal] 59(4), pp. 475-515. https://doi.org/10.1357/002224001762842163
  11. Lishaev, P.N., Korotaev, G.K., Knysh, V.V., Mizyuk, A.I. and Dymova, O.A., 2014. Vosstanovlenie Sinopticheskoy Izmenchivosti Gidrofizicheskikh Poley Chernogo Morya na Osnove Reanaliza za 1980–1993 Gody [Reproduction of Synoptic Variability of the Black Sea Hydrophysical Fields Based on Reanalysis for 1980-1993]. Morskoy Gidrofizicheskiy Zhurnal, (5), pp. 49-68 (in Russian).
  12. Dee, D.P., Uppala, S.M., Simmons, A.J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M.A., Balsamo, G. [et al.], 2011. The ERA-Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, [e-journal] 137(656), pp. 553-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
  13. Sukhikh, L.I. and Dorofeyev, V.L., 2016. The Study of Sensitivity of the Black Sea Hydrophysical Fields Reanalysis Results to the Applied Atmospheric Forcing. Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] (5), pp. 45-60. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2016-5-45-60
  14. Efimov, V.V., Savchenko, A.O. and Anisimov, A.E., 2014. Osobennosti Teploobmena Chernogo Morya s Atmosferoy v Osenne-Zimniy Period [Features of the Black Sea Atmosphere Heat Exchange in Autumn-Winter Period]. Morskoy Gidrofizicheskiy Zhurnal, (6), pp. 71-81 (in Russian).
  15. Berg, P., Feldmann, H. and Panitz, H.-J., 2012. Bias Correction of High Resolution Regional Climate Model Data. Journal of Hydrology, [e-journal] 448-449, pp. 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.026
  16. Cattiaux, J., Douville, H. and Peings, Y., 2013. European Temperatures in CMIP5: Origins of Present-Day Biases and Future Uncertainties. Climate Dynamics, [e-journal] 41(11-12), pp. 2889-2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1731-y
  17. Ibraev, R.A. and Dyakonov, G.S, 2016. Modeling of Ocean Dynamics with Large Variations in Sea Level. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, [e-journal] 52(4), pp. 455-466. doi:10.1134/S000143381604006X
  18. Altman, E.N. and Simonov, A.I. eds, 1991. Gidrometeorologiya i Gidrokhimiya Morey SSSR. T. IV. Chernoe More. Vyp. 1. Gidrometeorologicheskie Usloviya [Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the USSR Seas. Vol. IV. The Black Sea. Iss. 1. Hydrometeorologic Conditions]. Saint-Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 428 p. (in Russian).
  19. Goptarev, N.P., Simonov, A.I., Zatuchnaya, B.M. and Gershanovich, D.E., 1991. Gidrometeorologiya i Gidrokhimiya Morey SSSR. T. V. Azovskoe More. [Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the USSR Seas. Vol. V. The Azov Sea]. Saint-Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat, 235 p. (in Russian).
  20. Ilyin, Yu.P., Repetin, L.N., Belokopytov, V.N., Goryachkin, Yu., Dyakov, N.N., Kubryakov, A.A. and Stanichny, S., 2012. Gidrometeorologicheskie Usloviya Morey Ukrainy. T. 2: Chernoe More [Hydrometeorological Conditions of the Ukrainian Seas. Vol. 2. The Black Sea]. Sevastopol: ECOSI-Gidrofizika, 421 p. (in Russian).
  21. Boilley, А. and Wald, L., 2015. Comparison between Meteorological Re-analyses from ERA- Interim and MERRA and Measurements of Daily Solar Irradiation at Surface. Renewable Energy, [e-journal] 75, pp. 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042
  22. Anisimov, A.E., Yarovaya, D.A. and Barabanov, V.S., 2015. Reanalysis of Atmospheric Circulation for the Black Sea-Caspian Region. Physical Oceanography, [e-journal] (4), pp. 13-25. doi: 10.22449/1573-160X-2015-4-13-25

Download the article (PDF)