Dynamics of Underwater Bar of Sandy Coast under the Influence of Wave Action According to the Monitoring Observations

D. V. Korzinin✉, M. N. Shtremel

Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russian Federation

✉ e-mail: korzinin2000@mail.ru

Abstract

Purpose. Morphodynamic system of the accumulative sandy coast can include one or more underwater bars. Position and shape of the underwater bar can reflect both seasonal changes of the coastal profile and its unidirectional movements landward and seaward. Determination of the character of the underwater bar movement under the influence of various wave conditions permits to reveal common factors of the coastal deposit multidirectional transport along the coast profile.

Methods and Results. The results of field observations of morphodynamics of a section of the Baltic Spit sandy coast (600 m length) were analyzed. From May to November 2019, a series of measurements of the coastal zone relief were conducted. The obtained data were analyzed along with the wave regime parameters (reanalysis ERA5 data was used). The coastal profile of the area under study is complicated by the external underwater bar with its crest located at the depth 2.65 m, and by the internal one of a crescent shape.

Conclusions. Analysis of displacement of the external underwater bar from May to November showed that this form was of a morphodynamics two-dimensional character, i.e. it possessed the same morphometric characteristics along the coast. It was revealed that the underwater bar crest was located at the depths close to those of wave breaking during the most recent relatively strong and sustainable storm. Based on this concept as well as on the available literature data on the relationship between a wave height and dynamics of an underwater bar crest, described is the landward displacement (recorded during the observation period) of the external underwater bar. Due to the field data, it was shown that the underwater bar morphodynamics was effected both by duration of individual waves and by difference between the wave parameters of a sequence of storm events.

Keywords

sandy coast, coastal profile, wave regime, underwater bar, stages of storm

Acknowledgements

The investigation was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, RAS (theme No. 0149-2019-0005) and financial support of RFBR (project No. 18-05-00741 and project No. 18-55-45026).

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © D. V. Korzinin, M. N. Shtremel, 2020, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 36, Iss. 4, pp. 424–436 (2020)

For citation

Korzinin, D.V. and Shtremel, M.N., 2020. Dynamics of Underwater Bar of Sandy Coast under the Influence of Wave Action According to the Monitoring Observations. Physical Oceanography, 27(4), pp. 390–401. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2020-4-390-401

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2020-4-390-401

References

  1. Leontiev, I.O., 2011. Submarine Bars on Sandy Coasts. Oceanology, 51(1), pp. 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437011010115
  2. Leontiev, I.O., 2001. Coastal Dynamics: Waves, Currents, Sediment Transport. Moscow: GEOS, 272 p. (in Russian).
  3. Price, T.D., Ruessink, B.G. and Castelle, B., 2014. Morphological Coupling in Multiple Sandbar Systems – a Review. Earth Surface Dynamics, 2(1), pp. 309-321. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-309-2014
  4. Aleman, N., Robin, N., Certain, R., Barusseau, J.-P. and Gervais, M., 2013. Net Offshore Bar Migration Variability at a Regional Scale: Inter-Site Comparison (Languedoc-Roussillon, France). Journal of Coastal Research, 65(sp2), pp. 1715-1720. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI65-290.1
  5. Gervais, M., Balouin, Y. and Belon, R., 2012. Morfological Response and Coastal Dynamics Associated with Major Storm Events along the Gulf of Lions Coastline, France. Geomorphology, 143–144, pp. 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.07.035
  6. Inman, D.L., Elwany, M.H.S. and Jenkins, S.A., 1993. Shorerise and Bar-Berm Profiles on Ocean Beaches. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 98(C10), pp. 18181-18199. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JC00996
  7. Bernabeu, A.M., Medina, R. and Vidal, C., 2003. A Morphological Model of the Beach Profile Integrating Wave and Tidal Influences. Marine Geology, 197(1–4), pp. 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00087-2
  8. Yates, M.L., Guza, R.T., O’Reilly, W.C. and Seymour, R.J., 2009. Overview of Seasonal Sand Level Changes on Southern California Beaches. Shore & Beach, 77(1), pp. 39-46. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/817c/a0971803876b2723cc81fd03a4eb06495312.pdf [Accessed: 09 July 2020].
  9. Group, T.W., 1988. The WAM Model – A Third Generation Ocean Wave Prediction Model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(12), pp. 1775-1810. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018%3C1775:TWMTGO%3E2.0.CO;2
  10. Rivas, M.B. and Stoffelen, A., 2019. Characterizing ERA-Interim and ERA5 Surface Wind Biases Using ASCAT. Ocean Science, 15(3), pp. 831-852. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-831-2019
  11. Bruno, M.F., Molfetta, M.G., Totaro, V. and Mossa, M., 2020. Performance Assessment of ERA5 Wave Data in a Swell Dominated Region. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(3), 214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030214
  12. Shepard, F.P., 1950. Longshore-Bars and Longshore-Troughs. Technical memorandum No. 15. U.S. Beach Erosion Board, 32 p. Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015095245075&view=1up&seq=1 [Accessed: 10 July 2020].
  13. Larson, M. and Kraus, N.C., 1989. SBEACH: Numerical Model for Simulating Storm-Induced Beach Change. Technical Report CERC-89-9. US Army Engineering Waterways Experimental Station, 267 p.
  14. Houser, C. and Greenwood, B., 2005. Profile Response of a Lacustrine Multiple Barred Nearshore to a Sequence of Storm Events. Geomorphology, 69(1–4), pp. 118-137. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.12.005
  15. Leontiev I.O., 2014. [Morphodynamic Processes in the Coastal Zone of the Sea]. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 251 p. (in Russian).

Download the article (PDF)