Studying the Fluxes of the Marine Ecosystem Components from the Northwestern Shelf to the Deep Part of the Black Sea

V. L. Dorofeyev, L. I. Sukhikh

Marine Hydrophysical Institute of RAS, Sevastopol, Russian Federation

e-mail: l.sukhikh@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose. The study represents analysis of the features of the Black Sea ecosystem components transfer from the northwestern shelf to the deep-sea part and its dependence on circulation in the sea upper layer.

Methods and Results. The fluxes of water mass, nutrients and bioproduction from the shelf zone to the deep part of the sea were calculated using the current fields and biogeochemical ones resulted from the reanalysis, which, in its turn, was carried out due to the Black Sea ecosystem model including assimilation of remote sensing data both in the numerical circulation model and in the biogeochemical block. Numerical modeling permitted to calculate the fluxes through three sections that bound the shelf zone (by the capes Kaliakra and Chersonesus, and along the 200 m isobath). Behavior of the RIM Current jet and, consequently, direction and magnitude of the flows through the boundaries of the northwestern shelf depend on the wind stress vorticity over the western part of the Black Sea. The type of circulation with the intense RIM Current jet pressed to the shelf edge, is characterized by the pattern of distribution of the inorganic nitrogen and phytoplankton surface concentration as a narrow strip of its high values along the Black Sea western and partially southern coasts. When the RIM Current jet is weak or moves from the shelf edge (that corresponds to the low values of the wind stress vorticity) the increased concentration values are located on the northwestern shelf.

Conclusions. Direction, magnitude and character of horizontal distribution of the nutrient and bioproduction fluxes are determined mainly by circulation in the sea upper layer. The magnitude of these flows is significantly affected by difference between the nutrient and bioproduction concentrations in the shelf zone and in the deep part of the Black Sea.

Keywords

marine ecosystem, Black Sea, numerical modeling, northwestern shelf, circulation of the upper layer, nutrient transfer

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out at the support of the RSF grant No. 17-77-30001.

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © V. L. Dorofeyev, L. I. Sukhik, 2020, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 36, Iss. 5, pp. 501–513 (2020)

For citation

Dorofeyev, V.L. and Sukhikh, L.I., 2020. Studying the Fluxes of the Marine Ecosystem Components from the Northwestern Shelf to the Deep Part of the Black Sea. Physical Oceanography, 27(5), pp. 460-471. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2020-5-460-471

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2020-5-460-471

References

  1. Tolmazin, D., 1985. Changing Coastal Oceanography of the Black Sea. I: Northwestern Shelf. Progress in Oceanography, 15(4), pp. 217-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(85)90038-2
  2. Beckers, J.M., Gregoire, M., Nihoul, J.C.J., Stanev, E., Staneva, J. and Lancelot, C., 2002. Modelling the Danube-Influenced North-Western Continental Shelf of the Black Sea. I: Hydrodynamical Processes Simulated by 3-D and Box Models. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54(3), pp. 453-472. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0658
  3. Demyshev, S.G., 2011. Prognostic Numerical Analysis of Currents in the Black Sea with High Horizontal Resolution. Physical Oceanography, 21(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11110-011-9102-x
  4. Oguz, T. and Velikova, V., 2010. Abrupt Transition of the Northwestern Black Sea Shelf Ecosystem from a Eutrophic to an Alternative Pristine State. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 405, pp. 231-242. doi:10.3354/meps08538
  5. Lancelot, C., Staneva, J., van Eeckhout, D., Beckers, J.-M. and Stanev, E., 2002. Modelling the Danube-Influenced North-Western Continental Shelf of the Black Sea. II: Ecosystem Response to Changes in Nutrient Delivery by the Danube River after Its Damming in 1972. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54(3), pp. 473-499. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0659
  6. Grégoire, M., Soetaert, K., Nezlin, N. and Kostianoy, A., 2004. Modeling the Nitrogen Cycling and Plankton Productivity in the Black Sea Using a Three-Dimensional Interdisciplinary Model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 109(C5), C05007. doi:10.1029/2001JC001014
  7. Stanev, E., Beckers, J.M., Lancelot, C., Staneva, J.V., Le Traon, P.Y., Peneva, E.L. and Gregoire, M., 2002. Coastal-Open Ocean Exchange in the Black Sea: Observations and Modelling. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 54(3), pp. 601-620. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0668
  8. Shapiro, G.I., Stanichny, S.V., Stanychna, R.R., 2010. Anatomy of Shelf–Deep Sea Exchanges by a Mesoscale Eddy in the North West Black Sea as Derived from Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(4), pp. 867-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.020
  9. Kubryakov, A.A., Stanichny, S.V. and Zatsepin, A.G., 2018. Interannual Variability of Danube Waters Propagation in Summer Period of 1992–2015 and Its Influence on the Black Sea Ecosystem. Journal of Marine Systems, 179, pp. 10-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.11.001
  10. Dorofeev, V.L. and Sukhikh, L.I., 2016. Analysis of Variability of the Black Sea Hydrophysical Fields in 1993–2012 Based on the Reanalysis Results. Physical Oceanography, (1), pp. 33-47. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2016-1-33-47
  11. Dorofeyev, V.L. and Sukhikh, L.I., 2017. Some Trends in the Long-Term Variability of the Black sea Hydrophysical Fields on the Results of the Reanalysis. In: MHI, 2017. Ecological Safety of Coastal and Shelf Zones of Sea. Sevastopol: ECOSI-Gidrofizika. Iss. 1, pp. 15-22 (in Russian).
  12. Korotaev, G.K., Oguz, T., Dorofeyev, V.L., Demyshev, S.G., Kubryakov, A.I. and Ratner, Yu.B., 2011. Development of Black Sea Nowcasting and Forecasting System. Ocean Science, 7(5), pp. 629-649. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-7-629-2011
  13. Dee, D.P., Uppala, S.M., Simmons, A.J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M.A. and Balsamo, G. [et al.], 2011. The ERA-Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656), pp. 553-597. doi:10.1002/qj.828
  14. Ludwig, W., Dumont, E., Meybeck, M. and Heussner, S., 2009. River Discharges of Water and Nutrients to the Mediterranean and Black Sea: Major Drivers for Ecosystem Changes During Past and Future Decades? Progress in Oceanography, 80(34), pp. 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.02.001
  15. Suslin, V. and Churilova, T., 2016. A Regional Algorithm for Separating Light Absorption by Chlorophyll-a and Coloured Detrital Matter in the Black Sea, Using 480–560 nm Bands from Ocean Colour Scanners. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(18), pp. 4380-4400. doi:10.1080/01431161.2016.1211350
  16. Dorofeyev, V. and Sukhikh, L., 2018. A Model for Monitoring the Evolution of the Black Sea Ecosystem on the Basis of Remote Sensing Data Assimilation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(24), pp. 9339-9355. doi:10.1080/01431161.2018.1523589

Download the article (PDF)