Effect of Variations in the Ion-Salt Water Composition on the Accuracy of Salinity Measurements

N. Yu. Andrulionis, P. O. Zavialov, A. S. Izhitskiy

P. P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

e-mail: natalya@ocean.ru

Abstract

Purpose. The work is aimed at assessing the effect of variations in the major ion-salt composition on the accuracy of determining water salinity in the inland seas and other seawater areas. The main goal of the study is to assess the representativeness of the results of the CTD salinity measurements (standard in oceanological practice) for the areas where the ion-salt seawater composition differs from that of the ocean.

Methods and Results. Salinity values of the seawater samples collected in the expeditions in the Black Sea and the Kerch Strait, and also in the Kara and Caspian seas in 2014–2021, were obtained in four different ways: 1) measurements with a CTD-probe based on electrical conductivity (practical salinity); 2) based on the measured density values, calculation by the TEOS-10 equation of state with due regard for the regional correction for the areas under study (absolute salinity); 3) calculation by chlorine content using empirical dependencies for the corresponding water basins; 4) direct calculation based on a sum of components of the major ionic composition (similar to chemical determination in a laboratory).

Conclusions. Differences in the ratios of the main ions in the water chemical compositions of the water areas and basins under study significantly affect the accuracy of salinity determination by standard oceanographic equipment. The variations in the major ionic composition, especially in the surface layer of the sea coastal part, are assumed to be largely influenced by the continental freshwater runoff. The ionic composition variability, having been not taken into account, leads to the errors in the measurements of physical parameters at traditional CTD-probing.

Keywords

determination of salinity, salinity, ionic composition, chemical composition, component composition, density of seawater, seawater, potentiometric titration, Black Sea, Kerch Strait, Caspian Sea, Kara Sea

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 21-17-00191. The authors are grateful to all the participants of the expeditions in 2014–2021, the data obtained were used in the study.

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © N. Yu. Andrulionis, P. O. Zavialov, A. S. Izhitskiy, 2022, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 38, Iss. 5, pp. 481-498 (2022)

For citation

Andrulionis, N.Yu., Zavialov, P.O. and Izhitskiy, A.S., 2022. Effect of Variations in the Ion-Salt Water Composition on the Accuracy of Salinity Measurements. Physical Oceanography, 29(5), pp. 463-479. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2022-5-463-479

DOI

10.22449/1573-160X-2022-5-463-479

References

  1. Pawlowicz, R., 2013. Key Physical Variables in the Ocean: Temperature, Salinity, and Density. Nature Education Knowledge, 4(4), 13.
  2. Culkin, F. and Smed, J., 1979. The History of Standard Seawater. Oceanologica Acta, 2(3), pp. 355-364. Available at: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00122/23351/21178.pdf [Accessed: 08 September 2022].
  3. Millero, F.J., Feistel, R., Wright, D.G. and McDougall, T.J., 2008. The Composition of Standard Seawater and the Definition of the Reference-Composition Salinity Scale. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 55(1), pp. 50-72. doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2007.10.001
  4. Millero, F.J. and Chetirkin, P.V., 1980. The Density of Caspian Sea Waters. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 27(3-4), pp. 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(80)90017-5
  5. Millero, F.J., Mirzaliyev, A., Safarov, J., Huang, F., Chanson, M., Shahverdiyev, A. and Hassel, E., 2008. The Equation of State for Caspian Sea Waters. Aquatic Geochemistry, 14(4), pp. 289-299. doi:10.1007/s10498-008-9037-0
  6. Kremling, K., 1974. Relation between Chlorinity and Conductometric Salinity in Black Sea Water. In: E. T. Degens and D. A. Ross, 1974. The Black Sea – Geology, Chemistry, and Biology. Tulsa: The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, pp. 151-154. https://doi.org/10.1306/M20377C44
  7. Millero, F.J., 2010. History of the Equation of State of Seawater. Oceanography, 23(3), pp. 18-33. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2010.21
  8. Millero, F.J., 2013. Chemical Oceanography. 4th Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 591 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14753
  9. Amirgaliev, N.A., 2007. [Aral-Syr Darya Basin: Hydrochemistry, Problems of Aquatic Toxicology]. Almaty: Bastau, 224 p. (in Russian).
  10. Andrulionis, N.Yu. and Zavialov, P.O., 2019. Laboratory Studies of the Main Component Composition of Hypergaline Lakes. Physical Oceanography, 26(1), pp. 13-31. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2019-1-13-31
  11. Andrulionis, N.Yu., Zavialov, P.O. and Izhitskiy, A.S., 2022. Modern Evolution of the Salt Composition of the Residual Basins of the Aral Sea. Oceanology, 62(1), pp. 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437022010027
  12. Andrulionis, N.Y., Zavialov, P.O. and Izhitskiy, A.S., 2021. Current Evolution of the Salt Composition of Waters in the Western Basin of the South Aral Sea. Oceanology, 61(6), pp. 899-908. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437021060035
  13. Glukhovsky, B.Kh., ed., 1991. [Hydrometeorology and Hydrochemistry of the Seas of the USSR. Volume II: White Sea. Issue 2: Hydrochemical Conditions and Oceanological Foundations for the Formation of Biological Productivity]. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 193 p. (in Russian).
  14. Khoruzhii, D.S., Ovsyanyi, E.I., and Konovalov, S.K., 2011. Comparison of the Results of Determination of the Carbonate System and the Total Alkalinity of Seawater According to the Data Obtained by Using Different Analytic Methods. Physical Oceanography, 21(3), pp. 182- 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11110-011-9114-6
  15. Zatsepin, A.G., Zavialov, P.O., Kremenetskiy, V.V., Poyarkov, S.G. and Soloviev, D.M., 2010. The Upper Desalinated Layer in the Kara Sea. Oceanology, 50(5), pp. 657-667. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437010050036
  16. Osadchiev, A.A., Izhitskiy, A.S., Zavialov, P.O., Kremenetskiy, V.V., Polukhin, A.A., Pelevin, V.V. and Toktamysova, Z.M., 2017. Structure of the Buoyant Plume Formed by Ob and Yenisei River Discharge in the Southern Part of the Kara Sea during Summer and Autumn. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122(7), pp. 5916-5935. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012603
  17. Osadchiev, A.A., Asadulin, En.E., Miroshnikov, A.Yu., Zavialov, I.B., Dubinina, E.O. and Belyakova, P.A., 2019. Bottom Sediments Reveal Inter-Annual Variability of Interaction between the Ob and Yenisei Plumes in the Kara Sea. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 18642. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55242-3
  18. Osadchiev, A.A., Frey, D.I., Shchuka, S.A., Tilinina, N.D., Morozov, E.G. and Zavialov, P.O., 2021. Structure of the Freshened Surface Layer in the Kara Sea during Ice-Free Periods. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 126(1), e2020JC016486. doi:10.1029/2020JC016486
  19. Savenko, A.V. and Savenko, V.S., 2022. Adsorbed Chemical Elements of River Runoff of Solids and Their Role in the Transformation of Dissolved Matter Runoff into the Ocean. Minerals, 12(4), 445. doi:10.3390/min12040445

Download the article (PDF)