Evaluation of the Wind Speed and Wave Heights Simulation in the Kara Sea Using the COSMO-CLM and WAVEWATCH III Models

S. A. Myslenkov1, 2, 3, ✉, V. S. Platonov1

1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation

2 Hydrometeorological Research Centre of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

3 Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

e-mail: stasocean@gmail.com

Abstract

Purpose. The work is aimed to obtain the quality estimates of the results of modeling the wind speed and wave heights in the Kara Sea.

Methods and Results. The COSMO-CLM model was used to simulate the atmospheric conditions, and the WAVEWATCH III model – to obtain the wave parameters with high resolution in the coastal zone. Eight COSMO-CLM-based numerical experiments including various model options and grid sizes from 12 to 2.8 km were carried out for the periods September – October, 2012 and August – September, 2014. To assess the quality of wind speed and wave height modeling, the data of the CryoSat and SARAL satellites, as well as the coastal weather stations were used. Statistical indicators for assessing the quality of wind and wave reproduction for different model configurations were obtained. The wind speed assessing was best provided by the COSMO-CLM model configuration with the ~ 12 km resolution in the basic domain and the ~ 3 km resolution in the nested one; at that in both cases the “spectral nudging” technology was used. Verification using the weather stations data and the satellite measurements performed for the model optimal configuration, has shown that for the wind speed, the average correlation coefficients were ~ 0.8, the bias varied from 0.1 to 0.4 m/s, and the RMS error was 1.7–1.8 m/s. As for the wave height assessments, the best result was obtained when the wind fields with the 3 and 10 km resolutions were applied (the RMS error was ~ 0.4 m and the correlation coefficient was ~ 0.87).

Conclusions. It is shown that in all the cases, application of the “spectral nudging” technology improves quality of the wind speed and wave height modeling performed due to the COSMO-CLM – WW3 system for the Kara Sea region. Quality of the results of wind field reproduction using the COSMO-CLM model with the ~ 3 km resolution is comparable to quality of the ERA5 and CFSv2 reanalyses. Since mesoscale modeling provides a more detailed wind field spatial structure, especially in the coastal regions, the results permit to use the wind fields with the 3 km resolution for a wide range of scientific and applied tasks.

Keywords

Kara Sea, wind speed, wind waves, WAVEWATCH III, unstructured mesh, COSMO- CLM, simulation

Acknowledgements

The work by S. A. Myslenkov was carried out with support by the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of the Lomonosov Moscow State University “The Future of the Planet and Global Environmental Changes”. The meteorological parameters were calculated by V. S. Platonov using the COSMO-CLM model within the framework of the MSU state assignment on theme No. 121051400081-7 using the equipment of the shared research facilities of HPC computing resources of the Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Original russian text

Original Russian Text © S. A. Myslenkov, V. S. Platonov, 2023, published in MORSKOY GIDROFIZICHESKIY ZHURNAL, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, pp. 84-105 (2023)

For citation

Myslenkov, S.A. and Platonov, V.S., 2023. Evaluation of the Wind Speed and Wave Heights Simulation in the Kara Sea Using the COSMO-CLM and WAVEWATCH III Models. Physical Oceanography, 30(1), pp. 78-97. doi:10.29039/1573-160X-2023-1-78-97

DOI

10.29039/1573-160X-2023-1-78-97

References

  1. Korobov, P.V., Alekseev, V.V., Dymov, V.I., Yakovleva, N.P. and Smirnov, K.G., 2020. Verification of Model Calculations of Waves in the Gulf of Ob on the Basis of Instrumental Measurement Data in 2015-2017. Hydrometeorological Research and Forecasting, (2), pp. 79-89. doi:10.37162/2618-9631-2020-2-79-89 (in Russian).
  2. Diansky, N.A., Fomin, V.V., Kabatchenko, I.M. and Gruzinov, V.M., 2014. Simulation of Circulation of the Kara and Pechora Seas through the System of Express Diagnosis and Prognosis of Marine Dynamics. Arctic: Ecology and Economy, (1), pp. 57-73 (in Russian).
  3. Nesterov, E.S., ed., 2013. [Mode, Diagnosis and Forecast of Wind Waves in the Oceans and Seas]. Moscow: Hydrometeorological Scientific Research Center of Russian Federation, 295 p. (in Russian).
  4. Ashik, I.M., Alekseev, V.V., Bloshkina, E.V., Kulakov, M.Y., Makhotin, M.S., Tarasenko, A.D. and Filchuk, K.V., 2022. State and Development Prospects of the Hydrological Monitoring System of the Arctic Ocean. Arctic and Antarctic Research, 68(1), pp. 8-25. doi:10.30758/0555-2648-2022-68-1-8-25 (in Russian).
  5. Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H.-L., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadiga, S., Tripp, P., Kistler, R., Woollen, J. [et al.], 2010. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(8), pp. 1015-1058. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1
  6. Hulst, S. and van Vledder, G.Ph., 2013. CFSR Surface Wind Calibration for Wave Modelling Purposes. In: JCOMM, 2013. 13th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting and 4th Coastal Hazards Symposium: Proceedings. Available at: http://www.waveworkshop.org/13thWaves/index.htm [Accessed: 19 November 2022].
  7. Jayaram, C., Bansal, S., Krishnaveni, A.S., Chacko, N., Chowdary, V.M., Dutta, D., Rao, K.H., Dutt, C.B.S., Sharma, J.R. [et al.], 2016. Evaluation of SARAL/AltiKa Measured Significant Wave Height and Wind Speed in the Indian Ocean Region. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 44(2), pp. 225-231. doi:10.1007/s12524-015-0488-7
  8. Abdalla, S., Dinardo, S., Benveniste, J. and Janssen, P.A.E.M., 2018. Assessment of CryoSat-2 SAR Mode Wind and Wave Data. Advances in Space Research, 62(6), pp. 1421-1433. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2018.01.044
  9. Myslenkov, S., Platonov, V., Kislov, A., Silvestrova, K. and Medvedev, I., 2021. Thirty- Nine-Year Wave Hindcast, Storm Activity, and Probability Analysis of Storm Waves in the Kara Sea, Russia. Water, 13(5), 648. doi:10.3390/w13050648
  10. Stopa, J., Ardhuin, F. and Girard-Ardhuin, F., 2016. Wave Climate in the Arctic 1992-2014: Seasonality and Trends. The Cryosphere, 10(4), pp. 1605-1629. doi:10.5194/tc-10-1605-2016
  11. Duan, C., Dong, S. and Wang, Z., 2019. Wave Climate Analysis in the Ice-Free Waters of Kara Sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 30, 100719. doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100719
  12. Shestakova, A.A., Myslenkov, S.A. and Kuznetsova, A.M., 2020. Influence of Novaya Zemlya Bora on Sea Waves: Satellite Measurements and Numerical Modeling. Atmosphere, 11(7), 726. doi:10.3390/atmos11070726
  13. Diansky, N.A., Panasenkova, I.I. and Fomin, V.V., 2019. Investigation of the Barents Sea Upper Layer Response to the Polar Low in 1975. Physical Oceanography, 26(6), pp. 467-483. doi:10.22449/1573-160X-2019-6-467-483
  14. Platonov, V. and Kislov, A., 2020. High-Resolution COSMO-CLM Modeling and an Assessment of Mesoscale Features Caused by Coastal Parameters at Near-Shore Arctic Zones (Kara Sea). Atmosphere, 11(10), 1062. doi:10.3390/atmos11101062
  15. Platonov, V., Myslenkov, S.A., Arkhipkin, V.S. and Kislov, A., 2022. High-Resolution Modeling of Hydrometeorological Fields over the Kara Sea Coastal Regions with Irregular Coastline. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 5, Geografia, (1), pp. 87-106 (in Russian).
  16. Doms, G., Förstner, J., Heise, E., Herzog, H.-J., Mironov, D., Raschendorfer, M., Reinhardt, T., Ritter, B., Schrodin, R. [et al.], 2013. A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO-Model. Part II: Physical Parameterizations. Offenbach, Germany: DWD, 156 p. doi:10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-doc_5.00_II
  17. Rockel, B. and Geyer, B., 2008. The Performance of the Regional Climate Model CLM in Different Climate Regions, Based on the Example of Precipitation. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 17(4), pp. 487-498. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0297
  18. Rivin, G.S., Rozinkina, I.A., Vil’fand, R.M., Alferov, D.Yu., Astakhova, E.D., Blinov, D.V., Bundel’, A.Yu., Kazakova, E.V., Kirsanov, A.A. [et al.], 2015. The Cosmo-Ru System of Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Short-Range Weather Forecasting of the Hydrometcenter of Russia: The Second Stage of Implementation and Development. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 40(6), pp. 400-410. doi:10.3103/S1068373915060060
  19. Doms, G. and Baldauf, M., 2013. A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO- Model. Part I: Dynamics and Numerics. Offenbach, Germany: DWD, 160 p. doi:10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/cosmo-doc_5.00_I
  20. Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V.R., 1977. Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model. In: J. Chang, Ed., 1977. General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere. Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, vol. 17. Elsevier, pp. 173-265. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4
  21. Feser, F. and Barcikowska, M., 2012. The Influence of Spectral Nudging on Typhoon Formation in Regional Climate Models. Environmental Research Letters, 7(1), 014024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014024
  22. Schubert-Frisius, M., Feser, F., Von Storch, H. and Rast, S., 2017. Optimal Spectral Nudging for Global Dynamic Downscaling. Monthly Weather Review, 145(3), pp. 909-927. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0036.1
  23. Myslenkov, S.A., Platonov, V.S., Toropov, P.A. and Shestakova, A.A., 2015. Simulation of Storm Waves in the Barents Sea. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 5, Geografia, (6), pp. 65-75 (in Russian).
  24. Myslenkov, S.A., Platonov, V.S., Silvestrova, K.P. and Dobrolyubov, S.A., 2021. Increase in Storm Activity in the Kara Sea from 1979 to 2019: Numerical Simulation Data. Doklady Earth Sciences, 498(2), pp. 502-508. doi:10.1134/S1028334X2106012X
  25. Dee, D.P., Uppala, S.M., Simmons, A.J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M.A., Balsamo, G. [et al.], 2011. The ERA‐Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656), pp. 553-597. doi:10.1002/qj.828
  26. Platonov, V. and Varentsov, M., 2021. Introducing a New Detailed Long-Term COSMO- CLM Hindcast for the Russian Arctic and the First Results of its Evaluation. Atmosphere, 12(3), 350. doi:10.3390/atmos12030350
  27. Voevodin, V.V., Antonov, A.S., Nikitenko, D.A., Shvets, P.A., Sobolev, S.I., Sidorov, I.Yu., Stefanov, K.S., Voevodin, V.V. and Zhumatiy, S.A., 2019. Supercomputer Lomonosov-2: Large Scale, Deep Monitoring and Fine Analytics for the User Community. Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations, 6(2), pp. 4-11. doi:10.14529/jsfi190201
  28. Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R. [et al.], 2020. The ERA5 Global Reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(730), pp. 1999-2049. doi:10.1002/qj.3803
  29. Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Wu, X., Wang, J., Nadira, S., Tripp, P., Behringer, D., Hou, Y.-T., Chuang, H.-Y. [et al.], 2014. The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2. Journal of Climate, 27(6), pp. 2185-2208. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1
  30. Shestakova, A.A., Toropov, P.A. and Matveeva, T.A., 2020. Climatology of Extreme Downslope Windstorms in the Russian Arctic. Weather and Climate Extremes, 28, 100256. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2020.100256

Download the article (PDF)